“Hannibal,” Pringles and Kettle Chips…

Handsome scientist holding a clipboard and smiling at the camera in his laboratory

I’ve gone on about this before, and I just can’t stop.  There is a PhD thesis topic available to anyone who wants to comb through bad reviews of genre novels on Amazon.  If you really want to know what the required tropes of a romance novel are, read those bad reviews – they’ll tell you why a reader gets angry when a novel doesn’t deliver the exact same thing they expect from, well, every single novel they read.  I call them Pringles readers – they want the same chip out of the can every time, forever, with no surprises.

I got a bad review on “Faith” that dinged the book hard because there’s only one sex scene between the two MCs (there’s other sexin’ in there, but not between Rocky and Dex), and it comes near the end of the book.  So…what’s the quota?  How many sex scenes are required between MCs, and by what point in the book do they need to be Doin’ It So Hard?  Again, diligent research by some scholar could parse this for us, which would be very helpful!

Pringles readers are big on percentages.  They’re always looking at the bottom of their Kindle screen, watching that number, and getting angry when what they expect to happen hasn’t happened by X%.  They will complain that Y% of the book is backstory, or that the MCs don’t fuck until Z% of the way through the story.  If the MCs aren’t on the page together for at least W% of the story, they have to be on the page with their best friend, but only talking about/angsting over the other MC.  (TBH I did this in “A Little Too Broken.”)

Ever hear of the Bechdel Test?  I just did.  Alison Bechdel once said she wouldn’t see a movie where two women were only onscreen together to talk about a man.  Most commercially successful romance novels fail this test in spades.

Backstory is a no no because it’s time focused on a single character and not on the couple.  But, for me, who gives a shit if a couple is happy if you don’t know anything about them as people?  How do you know they’re gonna stay happy if you don’t know about their pasts, their personality development?  It’s just a Jared commercial otherwise, they must be happy because they’re together, right?  Right?

Whereas the Kettle Chip reader isn’t looking for the same chip every time.  In fact, as soon as the Kettle Chip reader discovers they’re in a Pringles book, they drop it like a dead rat and move on.  Kettle Chip readers want to be surprised, diverted, teased, drawn down the rabbit hole.

Which brings me to “Hannibal.”  SPOILERS!  If you haven’t seen the last two seasons, anyway.  And probably if you haven’t seen the season premiere, too.  Run away!  Run away!

OK they’re gone.  I love this show.  It’s a brilliant reimagining of the whole Lecter canon, the movies and the books.  It’s retelling the story in a parallel universe where many of the same characters still interact, but in wildly different ways.  The murder scenes are pure Grand Guignol, but the writing is superb, as is the acting.  The dynamic between Mads Mikkelson as Hannibal and Hugh Dancy as Will Graham is so tense, so rich, so demanding of your attention.  Gillian Anderson as Hannibal’s own former psychiatrist is riveting.  I can’t wait to see when Clarice Starling shows up, and how they work her in!  The show is on NBC but, the highest compliment, right, it’s HBO quality.

So last season ended with pretty much everyone potentially dead at Hannibal’s hands – Will Graham, Jack Crawford, and Alana Bloom, a non-canon character.  Now, in a Pringles world, how does season three start?  At 0% of the season premiere of a Pringles show, it picks up right where it left off, with all the potential corpses from the last season finale.  And we see who gets up and groans and grabs their wound and dials 911, we see who lived and who didn’t.

As Dr. Lecter said to Clarice in “Silence,” NO.  Instead we see Hannibal, who’s fled to Florence (canonical) with Gillian Anderson’s character, the gothically named Dr. Bedelia du Maurier. (Semi-canonical; Hannibal fled at the end of that eponymous novel to South America with Clarice in semi-romantic tow – this is how the show fucks with the canon in the most creative ways.)  The whole episode takes place in Florence, with no mention of whether or not Will and the others are dead.  Bedelia asks Hannibal point blank if Will is dead, and he gives an obtuse answer.

Yeah. That’s right.  Only, ONLY in the previews for the rest of the season do we see who’s still alive.  And if there were any Pringles viewers, and I highly doubt any of them made it to season three, they were all screaming at the TV, WHO’S DEAD!

I was delighted.  Absolutely, Kettlechippedly thrilled to be fucked with like that.  My attention to the proceedings was absolute, for fear that I’d miss a single clue as to who’d lived and who’d died.  It was brilliant.

The show is not a hit.  It’s not…a Pringle.  Hapless Dad and Sexy Mom and Wise Children Shitcoms (sic) are Pringles.  Detective shows that wrap up a killing with a bow in 44 minutes are Pringles.  “The Blacklist” is a Pringle because it’s patently absurd – yeah, the FBI stakes out a restaurant, puts cameras in the restaurant, to closely monitor its informant/captive while he meets with someone…and they leave the back door unguarded so he can make his easy escape.  It’s stupid.  I put up with it for a while because James Spader was riveting, but at a certain point, the stupidity overwhelms that quality.  Same with “Scandal,” it started out so “good soapy,” then retreaded the same stories over and over – Olivia and the President fuck, they fight, they part, they talk on the phone, a crisis brings them together, they fuck, they fight…etc.

Pringles viewers, do they even notice?  I don’t think so.  The essence of being a Kettle Chipper is your interrogation (to get all Frenchy-theoretical on it) of the text – does this feel real?  Do I believe this?  Do I then, on the basis of feel-realness, care what happens to these people?

I recently saw a documentary, “That Guy…Who Was In That Thing,” about character actors in LA.  You know their faces but not their names.  They’re working actors, and they’re happy, because they work at what they want.  They’ll never be leads, or stars.  But a lot of them have nice houses, and live well.

I’ve come to the realization that I’m going to be a “character writer.”  Midlist, probably never toplist, probably never the guy whose books will be on a supermarket shelf, or even the M/M version of that shelf.  But if I can make a living, if I can find enough Kettle Chip readers to keep me solvent and cubicle-job-free, I’m going to be happy.  I’m going to react with Aurelian equanimity to the slings and arrows (and percentages) of bad reviews.  I’m going to be like the writers of “Hannibal.”  I’m going to say “fuck you” to expectations, and confound them.  I’m going to pay the price for it in ratings, but that’s the course I’m on, and I’m not changing now.

7 Comments on “Hannibal,” Pringles and Kettle Chips…

  1. Kettle chip reader here!! Out and proud! I feel kind of bad because I am friends with one of these Pringle writers, but I don’t read her books. I was a beta for her for a very short time. I hate it so much, I made an excuse of too much work to have time to do it. Love the person, hate the books. Hallelujah, I have been saved by writers like you, Brandon Shire, Nick Wilgus, Rafe Haze. Dan Skinner, T.J.Webb….. Oh and give me back stories, give them to me till I’m gutted.

  2. Andrea Taylor // June 6, 2015 at 7:05 am // Reply

    I started checking out a lot of ebooks from the library when I got my Kindle (sooo much easier than having to schlep books back and forth). I started noticing the pringle pattern in the romance books I checked out of “first sex scene between MC at 50% through the book”. It was so funny that it was so consistent. The only time it was off is when there was a lot of “back matter”, i.e. tons of excerpts from other books at the end, but if you looked at just the main story itself, it was always 50%. Now these all tended to be books that went through publishing houses, not indy, so you can be sure there is some editor back there, adjusting things, giving feedback to the author (“we need a scene here”) to make sure they hit that 50% mark.

    I got really, really tired of pringles. Which led me to the indy scene on Amazon. Which has its own problems, but one thing it does have is diversity. No more pringles. I have a KU subscription which has helped to cure some of the problems with the indy scene (“I paid $5 for this trash? The author must have paid for reviews.”), and I’ve found quite a few authors that are gems that I probably wouldn’t have stumbled across any other way. One of which is our own beloved Brad Vance (and I read Adam’s book too). Faith is actually the first Brad Vance book I read, and I thought it was nice, but not stellar. Brad has talked about getting dinged in reviews over the amount of backstory in the book, and for me the problematic part was not necessarily the amount, but the fact that a lot of it was redundant. Three paragraphs to say what could be said in one. I actually like the flashback motif to fill in a character, but Faith went repeatedly back to the same ground over and over (especially with Rocky), and it was kind of, “Okay, we get it, can we move on now?”

    The second Brad Vance book I read was Apollo’s Curse, and that’s the one that hooked me on Brad for life. Absolutely fantastic book, didn’t even realize there was no on screen sex in the book until I read his blog about it. When I find myself leafing past the sex scenes in a book, I wish I could hit the author over the head with, “If it doesn’t say anything new, leave it the fuck out!” I don’t need another retelling of the same boring “tab A in slot B” scene. Probably a pringle chip “have to hit my quota of sex scenes” thing.

    I pull from KU almost everything that gets put up in certain categories. Only takes a few pages in before I know if it’s a wallbanger I don’t want to go any farther with. Many, many KU books hit the wall. And I have to be honest with you Brad, if it wasn’t your name on the cover, Would I Lie to You? would have been a wallbanger. Most of the times I “nope” a book because of bad writing, or being obvious “I’m writing a shit book about a trope that is popular”. This wasn’t the problem with Lie. I like the sex in my books to be rough, raw, and real, and most often you get that in books that are marketed as BDSM. I’m not really into BDSM though, and if its a scene that has a lot of elaborate setup, almost cerebral in approach, it’s gonna get skipped. The opening scene in Lie not only screams “setup”, but it’s also almost entirely humiliation and degradation, which I seriously do not like, and I suspect a lot of other people don’t either. This book is marketed in the Romance category, and to me, being made to lick someone’s dirty boot is not romance, paying someone to force you to lick their dirty boot is even farther off the mark. Doesn’t matter what comes after, this is what opens the book, this is what says to the reader, “This is what you’re going to get.” Doesn’t surprise me at all that someone pulling that from KU would return it before getting to the pay point, or not pull the trigger on a purchase after reading a sample. Definitely a “nope, nope, fucking nope” sort of thing. If I had to point to one thing about why Lie isn’t selling, it’s that opening scene.

    Well, um, so that’s my gush-of-morning-honesty-before-ive-had-caffeine bit.

    • Thank you 🙂 Yeah, that first page was probably a turnoff to a lot of readers. I’m glad you like enough of my books to care about this, and post your honest thoughts. And I’m glad you loved “Apollo,” it’s my favorite of all my books…probably the best thing I’ll ever write.

  3. CrabbyPatty // June 12, 2015 at 3:21 pm // Reply

    Okay, here’s some thoughts about reviews and those annoying Pringles folks …… years ago, our group of friends went to a fantastic old school theatre to see a screening of “Lawrence of Arabia” newly restored, on a 70mm screen.

    It was GLORIOUS … Peter O’Toole’s stunning blue eyes were HUGELY stunning, it was epic, it was spectacular (you get the drift). Afterwards, we all met up at the concessions stand, and after I had raved about how wonderful it was ……. an acquaintance in the group flatly stated she did NOT like the movie.

    The reason she did not like the movie? And I quote ….. “Too much sand …… not enough women.” Never mind that the story is pretty aptly titled and the frickin’ desert is a crucial element in attacking Aqaba from the desert rather than by sea ….. AND there were NO women involved in the plot in any way/shape/form. Yet this woman felt that the story needed to be diversified, genderified, sanitized, and so on in order to make it acceptable. So, don’t worry about what others think because you will never please everybody!

    • Hahahahahaha! LOVE THIS. Yeah if you go into a book (or movie) with a “shopping list” of what you must have, you’re probably gonna be disappointed. We all need to be Lawrences, to have that sense of adventure when we go into new stories…

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. 15,700 and all blocked out…and more on Military Science Fiction | Adam Vance - Science Fiction Author
  2. Lionel Shriver and “Writing The Other” – Brad Vance Author

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: